Analysis shows stability of social regulatory systems based on norms, indicating contextual dominance in societies.
The article analyzes social regulatory systems, their typology, and interaction based on the formula of universal utility. The author divides norms into external (traditional and legislative) and internal (moral), emphasizing the role of dominant systems (universal or local), which establish basic behavioral rules, and peripheral ones, ensuring flexibility and cultural diversity. The central element of the study is a formula integrating parameters such as norm adherence, probability of sanctions, social pressure, and collective benefit. This formula allows for assessing the stability of regulatory systems and identifying the dominant type within a specific sociocultural context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. V. Nozdrunov (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: