Cross-sectional study highlights how sociodemographic factors impact surrogate understanding of end-of-life preferences.
Designating a surrogate decision-maker and discussing end-of-life preferences are essential steps to prepare for a potential future loss of decision-making capacity. Yet, little is known about the factors associated with better surrogate understanding of a person's end-of-life preferences. We aimed to examine which sociodemographic factors, values related to end-of-life care, and decision-making-related factors were associated with perceived surrogate understanding of end-of-life preferences among adults who had designated a surrogate. This cross-sectional study entailed a secondary analysis of data from the Public Awareness of Hospice and Palliative Care Study 2018, a nationwide, web-based survey conducted in Japan. The survey included 1000 adults aged 20–79 who were registered with a market research company. Participants were asked to evaluate the extent to which their designated surrogate understood their end-of-life care preferences. The participants had a mean age of 50.3 years (SD = 15.7), and 51% were female. Among the 873 participants who had designated a surrogate, 57.4% had never discussed their end-of-life preferences with that person. Only 19.9% (n = 174) believed that their surrogate understood their preferences sufficiently. Perceived surrogate understanding was associated with several factors, including age, living status, preferences regarding diagnostic disclosure to family, preferences for end-of-life treatment goals, and the extent of prior end-of-life discussion. The results emphasize the value of end-of-life discussions and the influence of individual characteristics on perceived surrogate understanding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawashima et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: