This analysis compares B-mode and M-mode ultrasound for measuring diaphragm mobility in healthy adults, revealing significant agreement.
Abstract Purpose: This study proposes a new method B-mode ultrasound to assess right hemidiaphragm mobility during maximal respiration in healthy adults. Methods: In 29 healthy volunteers, the mean and coefficient of variation of diaphragmatic excursion measured by M-mode and a new B-mode measurements were compared, and their agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) in 15 healthy volunteers. Results: The mean values for diaphragmatic mobility using M-mode and B-mode ultrasound methods were 6.03 ± 1.21 cm and 3.97 ± 0.93 cm, respectively, with coefficients of variation of 0.1103 ± 0.0627 and 0.0772 ± 0.0347. The Bland-Altman plot showed the consistency of the two methods. The ICCs for the first and second M-mode measurements by senior physicians, compared with those by junior physicians, were 0.851 (95% CI: 0.615–0.947), 0.671 (95% CI: 0.177–0.883), and 0.659 (95% CI: 0.168–0.877). For the B-mode ultrasound measurements, the corresponding ICC values were 0.812 (95% CI: 0.533–0.933), 0.832 (95% CI: 0.464–0.945), and 0.701 (95% CI: 0.208–0.896).” Conclusions: The B-mode ultrasound method demonstrated accurate measurement of diaphragmatic mobility, with strong agreement when compared to M-mode ultrasound.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: