Literature review explores personalized conflict resolution strategies for air traffic controllers, highlighting implementation challenges and acceptance rates.
The global shortage of air traffic controllers (ATCOs) has led to significant challenges. One of them is the high workload of ATCOs, often resulting in flight delays. This makes it essential to develop solutions that reduce ATCOs’ workload in order to increase capacity. One promising approach is the integration of decision-support systems. A typical task for which these systems are used for is the resolution of aircraft conflicts in the upper airspaces. A key challenge in implementing these support systems is to ensure a high acceptance and adoption rate of the proposed advisories. One potential solution to this problem is to personalize the advisories, aligning them with individual ATCOs’ preferences and conflict resolution strategies. As this approach offers many promising research directions, this literature review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of existing research in this domain and highlight potential opportunities and open challenges. Overall, 16 papers are discussed in detail to examine the diversity of conflict resolution strategies among ATCOs, the impact of personalization on the acceptance rate of advisories, the technical feasibility of implementing personalization, and the balance between personalized advisories and operational efficiency. Additionally, this paper highlights the opportunities such personalization presents, along with the unresolved challenges that should be addressed in future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Renkhoff et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: