Research reveals nutrient resorption efficiency connects with leaf traits in mangroves, highlighting disparities with root strategies.
Leaf nutrient resorption efficiency (NuRE) is critical for plant nutrient conservation, yet its relationship with leaf and root economic traits remains poorly understood in mangroves. We quantified nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) resorption across ten mangrove species (five trees and five shrubs) in Hainan, China, and related NuRE to key leaf (leaf mass per area, LMA; leaf dry mass content, LDMC; and green leaf nitrogen and phosphorus contents, Ngr and Pgr, respectively) and root (specific root length, SRL; root tissue density, RTD; root diameter, RD; and root nitrogen content, Nroot) traits. We found that species with a lower leaf structural investment (LMA = 103–173 g m−2, LDMC = 19–27%) presented a 6–45% greater N and P resorption efficiency than those with a higher structural investment (LMA = 213–219 g m−2, LDMC = 26–31%). Contrary to global meta-analyses, higher green leaf N and P contents also predicted a greater NuRE, implying enhanced internal recycling under chronic nutrient limitation. Root traits (SRL, RTD, RD, and Nroot) had no significant influence on NuRE, indicating decoupled above- versus belowground strategies. Trees and shrubs diverged in size but converged in NuRE–leaf trait relationships. These findings refine plant economics theory and guide restoration by prioritizing species with acquisitive, high-NuRE foliage for nutrient-poor coasts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: