Narrative review highlights cftr modulators' effect on gastrointestinal function and nutritional health in children with cystic fibrosis, suggesting careful monitoring is essential.
Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a multisystemic disorder caused by CFTR gene mutations, leading to impaired protein function and affecting pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, skeletal, and nutritional health. The advent of CFTR modulators—especially the triple therapy elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI)—has revolutionized clinical management, offering genotype-specific benefits beyond pulmonary outcomes. Pediatric gastroenterologists must now recognize and address emerging gastrointestinal and nutritional challenges introduced by modulator therapy. Methods: A narrative review was conducted to assess the impact of CFTR modulators on gastrointestinal function, nutritional status, bone health, and hepatobiliary involvement in pediatric patients. A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. Filters included articles in English or Spanish. Following full-text review based on relevance and quality, 68 articles were selected for inclusion in this review. Results: CFTR modulators have demonstrated potential improvements in gastrointestinal function, nutrient absorption, weight gain, and bone mineral density. In pediatric populations, ETI therapy has been associated with early increases in lean mass, enhanced vitamin levels, and promising trends in bone microarchitecture. However, variable outcomes regarding liver function and bone mineral density highlight the need for careful monitoring. Conclusions: While CFTR modulators present novel opportunities for systemic improvement in CF, their long-term impact on digestive and skeletal health in children remains under investigation. Pediatric gastroenterologists play a pivotal role in monitoring nutritional and hepatobiliary outcomes, optimizing treatment plans, and guiding personalized care strategies in the era of CFTR modulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiménez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: