This analysis reveals how implementation delay affects optimal consumption and retirement behavior, suggesting policy implications.
We develop a continuous-time model of optimal consumption, portfolio allocation, and early retirement that, to our knowledge, is the first to incorporate an implementation delay —a fixed lag δ between the retirement decision and the actual cessation of labor and income. Using a dual-martingale approach, we obtain closed-form solutions and quantify how δ affects optimal behavior. For example, when δ increases from 0.5 to 2 years (baseline parameters: β=0.04, r=0.02, μ=0.08, σ=0.2, γ=3, kB=0.3, and ε=1), optimal pre-retirement consumption rises by approximately 7%, the risky asset share falls by about 5 percentage points, the expected retirement time increases by over 1 year, and the retirement wealth threshold xR grows by roughly 10%. These results provide policy-relevant insights for retirement systems where procedural lags can distort incentives and reduce welfare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: