Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 2025Юридические исследованияOpen Access

Examination of digital evidence in criminal proceedings: judicial aspect

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ATAndrei Ivanovich Turshin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Analysis reveals gaps in legislation for digital evidence in criminal procedures, suggesting reforms in judicial practices.

Key Points

  • The examination of electronic evidence enhances judicial actions, facilitating more accurate court proceedings.
  • Three types of electronic evidence include pre-trial formed evidence, party-provided media, and online sources.
  • Methods included judicial practice analysis and comparative law, revealing legislative gaps across jurisdictions.
  • This study supports the creation of specific regulations for electronic evidence, aiming for consistent judicial application.

Cite This Study

Andrei Ivanovich Turshin (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af55c6ad7bf08b1eadbd86https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2025.8.75591
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ELECTRONIC CRIMINAL CASE: THEORETICAL MODEL2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Digital Evidence in Criminal Cases Before the U.S. Courts of Appeal: Trends and Issues for Consideration2019 · 8 citations
  3. 3THE USE OF CELL PHONE DATA IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: URGENT LEGAL ISSUES AND PROSPECTS2021 · 1 citations
  4. 4Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Criminal Procedural Proving2023 · 14 citations