Analysis reveals serum cea, ca72-4, and ca19-9 are linked to recurrence in gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy, indicating risk factors.
[Objective]: To determine if serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9, and PGI in gastric cancer patients following radical gastrectomy are associated with postoperative recurrence. [Methods]: The gastric cancer group consisted of 102 patients who were admitted to our hospital between January 2022 and June 2024 and had undergone radical gastrectomy (RG); the control group consisted of 34 healthy volunteers who were examined during the same time period. Based on whether there was a recurrence following the procedure, patients with gastric cancer were split into two groups: 87 patients who did not experience a recurrence and 15 patients who did. The control group's serum levels of CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9, and PGI were assessed during physical examination, the day before surgery for gastric cancer patients, and at follow-up (or recurrence) one year later. [Result] In the gastric cancer group, serum levels of PGI were lower than in the control group, whereas CEA, CA72-4, and CA19-9 were greater (all P<0.05). The recurrence rate (15/102 patients) was 14.71%. Poor differentiation degree, decreased PGI, and TNM stage III disease were all independent risk variables for recurrence following RG, according to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (P<0.05). The sensitivity of the serum CEA level was 85.74%, and the specificity was 56.83%. The sensitivity of the serum CA72-4 concentration was 39.46%, and the specificity was 95.13%. Sensitivity of CA19-9 concentration was 58.91%, and the specificity was 78.11%. The AUC of the combined prediction of postoperative recurrence in patients with RG according to CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9 and PGI was greater than that of the individual predictions. [Conclusion]: Patients with RG who had elevated CEA, CA72-4, and CA19-9, decreased PGI, TNM stage III, and little differentiation are at independent risk for postoperative recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: