Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis of machine learning models shows Random Forest exceeds others in predicting diabetes risk.
Diabetes is a major global health challenge, contributing to increased mortality and long-term complications worldwide. Early diagnosis and effective risk stratification are critical to reducing the disease burden. This research aims to evaluate and compare the predictive performance of five machine learning (ML) models—Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—using the Pima Indians Diabetes Dataset. A standardized experimental workflow involving data preprocessing, missing value imputation, feature scaling, model training was applied. Performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to evaluate model outcomes. Among the models tested, Gradient Boosting achieved the highest accuracy (75.97%), whereas Random Forest attained the highest AUC (0.833), indicating its superior classification capability. These results demonstrate that Random Forest model, offers a promising and practical approach for implementing robust diabetes risk prediction tools in clinical or public health contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boyi Yang (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: