Experimental study reveals significant interactions between drilling fluid parameters and cuttings bed effects on wellbore integrity.
The deposition of large-sized cuttings (or blocky cuttings) is a critical risk factor for stuck pipe incidents during the drilling of deep and extended-reach wells. This risk is particularly pronounced in well sections with long borehole trajectories and low drilling fluid return velocities, where it poses a substantial threat to wellbore cleanliness and the safe operation of the drill string. This study utilizes a self-developed visual experimental platform to simulate the deposition evolution of large-sized cuttings (20–40 mm in diameter) in the annulus under various wellbore inclinations and drilling fluid parameters. The stable height, lateral distribution characteristics, and response patterns of the resulting cuttings bed under different conditions were quantitatively characterized. Building upon this, a theoretical contact friction model between the drill string and the cuttings bed was employed to investigate how the bed height influences hook load during tripping and rotary torque during top drive operation. A mapping relationship was established between cuttings bed structural parameters and the resulting additional loads and torques. Results reveal significant interactive effects among drilling fluid velocity, fluid density, drill pipe rotation speed, and wellbore inclination on both cuttings bed development and associated drill string loads. Strong correlations were identified among these parameters. Based on these findings, a stuck pipe early-warning indicator system is proposed using frictional load thresholds, with clearly defined safety limits for cuttings bed height. Recommendations for optimizing cuttings transport parameters through coordinated control of fluid velocity, density, and rotary speed are also provided, offering theoretical support and engineering guidance for borehole cleaning strategies and stuck pipe risk prediction in large cuttings scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: