Qualitative analysis reveals challenges in rape policing in Mankweng, highlighting a need for community awareness and education.
This study explored the adequacy of selected legislative frameworks in policing rape in Mankweng, focusing on Nobody, Ga-Thoka, Ga-Makanye, and Mentz. A qualitative, exploratory design was used, with purposive sampling of 33 participants. Data collection involved semi-structured Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and In-Depth Interviews (IDIs), analysed through the inductive Thematic Content Analysis. The Broken Windows Theory guided the study. Six legislative frameworks were examined: 1) The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, 2) Criminal Procedure Act, 3) South African Police Service, 4) Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 5) The Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act (here referred to as the DNA Act, 2013), and; 6) The National Liquor Act. Findings revealed limited understanding and access to these laws, highlighting challenges in policing rape effectively. Participants cited barriers to engaging with relevant legal frameworks and the need for improved community awareness. The study underscores the importance of regular SAPS-led discussions to promote rape legislation awareness and strengthen police-community relationships. Strong, well-implemented legal frameworks are essential for consistency, fairness, and transparency in handling rape cases. The Adequacy of Legislative Frameworks in Regulating Rape in the Selected Mankweng Policing Areas, Capricorn District, Limpopo Province, South Africa
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: