Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective planning confirms erectile tissue sparing may maintain target volumes and improves outcomes in prostate cancer treatment.
Introduction An estimated one in six Australian men are diagnosed with prostate cancer (PC) by age 85. Cure and quality of life are the modern definitions of successful cancer treatment, and preservation of continence and sexual function relates closely to treatment outcome satisfaction. Erectile tissue sparing (ETS) is not generally standard practice for PC stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). This retrospective planning study aimed to determine if erectile tissue (ET) could be spared whilst maintaining clinically acceptable doses to target volumes (TV) and critical organs during PC SBRT. Methods Imaging datasets of 30 PC patients treated at our centres were used. Patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, with the creation of a substitute CT (sCT) for planning. ET structures, including penile bulb (PB), internal pudendal arteries (IPA) and neurovascular bundles (NVB), were contoured on MRI. Two 40 Gy in five fraction plans were created for each patient, with and without ETS constraints. Plans were compared using Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests. Results Significant dose reduction was observed in bilateral IPAs and NVBs using ETS plans. No significant difference was seen in coverage of the clinical TVD 95% , rectum V 36Gy , urethra planning risk volume V 42Gy , bladder V 36Gy , or PB. Changes in coverage of the planning TVD 95% and bladder V 40Gy were deemed not clinically relevant. Conclusion Results indicate that ETS is feasible in conjunction with a planning MRI during SBRT for PC without compromise to TVs. Further prospective investigation is required to observe whether a decrease in ET dose correlates to a preservation in sexual function and/or improved treatment outcome satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hudson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: