Comparative analysis highlights dielectric switching in a copper-bromide compound, suggesting roles of molecular motions.
Stimuli‐responsive phase transition materials exhibiting reversible switching between distinct dielectric states have emerged as promising candidates for applications in memory storage, logic circuits, and smart sensors. However, a fundamental challenge remaining is the lack of in‐depth understanding of the structure‐property relationships that govern phase transitions. Herein, a comparative study of three pyridine‐based copper (II) bromide compounds is given, [C 5 NH 6 ] 2 [CuBr 4 ] ( 1 ), [CuBr 2 (C 5 NH 5 ) 2 ] ( 2 ), and [(C 5 NH 6 ) 2 (18‐crown‐6) 2 ][CuBr 4 ] ( 3 ), falling into three different structural categories: a zero‐dimensional organic–inorganic hybrid, a coordination complex, and a supramolecular host‐guest compound, respectively. Among them, only compound 1 has a distinct order–disorder phase transition accompanied by switchable dielectric property. Structural analyses and Hirshfeld surface studies reveal that the loosely packed hybrid framework of compound 1 enables moderate intermolecular interactions and sufficient motional freedom of the pyridinium cations, thereby dominating the phase transition. In contrast, for compounds 2 and 3 , such molecular motions are significantly suppressed by the stronger coordination bonding or hydrogen bonds. These findings emphasize the decisive role of competition between molecular motions and suitable intermolecular interactions in modulating structural phase transitions, offering valuable insights into the crystal engineering of functional materials with dielectric switching behaviors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: