Teleseismic analysis reveals the geometry of the main himalayan thrust, suggesting diverse seismic hazard scenarios in the region.
Summery The seismic hazard due to higher magnitude Himalayan earthquakes largely depends on the geometry of the underthrusting Indian Plate beneath the Himalayas, i.e., the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT). For an objective assessment of seismic hazard in the central Himalayan seismic gap, we determine the geometry of the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT) along 4 ∼SW-NE oriented arc-normal seismic profiles covering the central Himalayan seismic gap. We use teleseismic P- wave coda autocorrelation on waveforms recorded at 117 broadband seismic stations spread along these profiles, with an interstation spacing of 3-5 km. The results show that along these seismic profiles, the MHT is mostly of flat-ramp-flat geometry. However, the mid-crustal ramp of the MHT shows variations in its location, dip angle, and width. We also observe variations in the MHT near the Main Frontal Thrust (MFT) and Main Boundary Thrust (MBT). The observed variations in the MHT geometry within the central Himalayan seismic gap thus suggest the possibility of along-strike segmentation of the Himalayan arc, and different seismic hazard scenarios may be present during any possible higher magnitude earthquake in the central Himalayan seismic gap.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: