Electrochemical measurements reveal redox splitting in ruthenium compounds, suggesting mixed valence characteristics.
In this work, we synthesized and fully characterized two binuclear saturated phosphine‐bridged compounds and their one‐electron oxidation products, [CpRu( μ ‐modppe)Cl] 2 ( 1 ), [CpRu( μ ‐modppe)Cl] 2 [PF 6 ] ( 1 + ), [CpRu( μ ‐modppb)Cl] 2 ( 2 ), [CpRu( μ ‐modppb)Cl] 2 [PF 6 ] ( 2 + ) (Cp=cyclopentadienyl, modppe=1,2‐Bis(di(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐phosphino)ethane, modppb=1,4‐Bis(di(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐phosphino)butane). Electrochemical measurements show the redox splitting of 277 and 104 mV between the two Ru II centres of complexes 1 and 2 . But, the UV/vis‐NIR spectra of 1 + and 2 + show that the absorption peak in the NIR region should be the d‐d electronic transition of the Ru III centre. So, complexes 1 + and 2 + should be ascribed to class I mixed valence compounds. In addition, we obtained the single‐crystal structure of Class I mixed‐valence compound 1 + , while compound 2 + crystallizes into a special co‐crystal 2 + · 0.5 2 2+ .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: