Functional analysis shows NOD2 influences epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stemness in glioblastoma, indicating its therapeutic potential.
Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) represents one of the most aggressive and lethal primary brain malignancies, characterized by rapid proliferation, extensive invasiveness, and a dismal prognosis. Emerging evidence implicates nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2), an intracellular pattern recognition receptor, as a potential driver of GBM progression. This study investigates NOD2’s role in promoting glioblastoma through its effects on the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer stem cell (CSC) markers. Methods: NOD2 expression levels and survival outcomes were assessed using TCGA data from GBM tumor samples (n = 153) and normal brain tissues (n = 5). NOD2 protein expression was validated in glioma cell lines using Western blot and immunofluorescence analyses. Functional studies employed siRNA-mediated NOD2 knockdown to evaluate effects on cellular proliferation, migration, invasion, and colony formation, while correlations between NOD2 and EMT/CSC markers were assessed. Results: The analysis of TCGA data revealed a significantly elevated NOD2 expression in GBM tumors compared to normal brain tissue, with a high NOD2 expression correlating with a reduced disease-free survival in GBM patients. All tested glioma cell lines demonstrated robust NOD2 expression. Functional analyses demonstrated that NOD2 depletion substantially impaired cellular proliferation, migration, invasion, and the colony-forming capacity. Mechanistically, siRNA-mediated NOD2 knockdown significantly decreased the expression of EMT (Snail, SLUG, Vimentin) and CSC markers (CD44, CD133) at both protein and mRNA levels. Conclusions: Our results indicate that NOD2 contributes to GBM progression by influencing EMT and CSC pathways. These findings suggest NOD2’s potential as a therapeutic target in glioblastoma, highlighting the need for further mechanistic studies and therapeutic exploration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jahan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: