Retrospective cohort analysis evaluates relationships between hematological markers and high-grade cervical lesions, suggesting HPV genotyping is critical.
Background/Objectives: This study was designed to investigate the relationship between peripheral hematological inflammation markers, namely, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) and high-grade cervical lesions (CIN2+). Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 358 patients who underwent cervical excision procedures. Patients were divided into two groups: <CIN2 and CIN2+. Preoperative complete blood count data were used to calculate the inflammation indices. HPV genotypes were also recorded. Logistic regression and ROC analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive performance. Results: CIN2+ lesions were detected in 69.6% of participants. In the univariate analysis, only age and HPV 16 positivity (p < 0.005) showed a significant association with the presence of CIN2+. NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, and SIRI values did not show significant differences between groups (all p > 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, increasing age was independently associated with a decrease in the risk of CIN2+ (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94–0.99), while HPV 16 positivity was associated with an increase in risk (OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.43–4.18). ROC analysis showed that combining age and HPV 16 status improved the specificity (85.1%) of predicting CIN2+ compared to using age alone (42.2%). Conclusions: Peripheral haematological inflammation markers (NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, and SIRI) did not show predictive value in predicting CIN2+ lesions. However, age and HPV 16 infection were found to be independent predictors. These findings suggest that haematological indices may reflect systemic inflammatory responses but are not sufficient on their own for the detection of CIN2+. HPV genotyping is of critical importance for the early detection of high-grade lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alcı et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: