Quantitative research shows that beneficiary involvement enhances financial sustainability in rural water supply projects, suggesting stronger community engagement is needed.
The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of beneficiary involvement on financial sustainability of selected rural water supply projects in Rulindo District, Rwanda. It focused on understanding how genuine involvement of beneficiaries in the initiation, planning, implementation, and monitoring phases of rural water supply projects can enhance their financial sustainability, using Rulindo District as a case study. A quantitative research design was adopted, with a target population of 20,074 households from three administrative sectors of Rulindo District namely Shyorongi, Rusiga, and Bushoki. A proportional sampling was used to ensure the sample accurately represented the population, with 203 respondents from Shyorongi Sector, 63 from Rusiga Sector, and 111 from Bushoki Sector. Primary data were collected through a self-developed questionnaire, and the reliability of the instrument was tested, yielding Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients above 0.7. The study achieved a 100% response rate. Data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics, multiple linear regression, to explore the contribution of beneficiary involvement on financial sustainability. Quantitative results indicated that beneficiary involvement explained about 54.1% of variance in financial sustainability. The study concluded that the involvement of beneficiaries, particularly during the initiation and monitoring phases, is crucial for achieving financial sustainability. The study recommends that the beneficiaries of rural water supply projects should be involved across all phases of these projects via structured community involvement strategies such as water user committees, participatory rural appraisal, community contracting, stakeholder workshops and consultations, training and capacity building programs, community monitoring and reporting systems and inclusion of women and marginalized groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shyaka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: