Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling predicts CYP2C induction risk in drug interactions, suggesting improved assessment methods.
Background: Accurate assessment of CYP2C induction-mediated drug–drug interactions (DDIs) remains a challenge, despite the importance of CYP2C enzymes in drug metabolism. Limitations in available models and scarce clinical induction data have hampered quantitative preclinical DDI risk evaluation. Methods: In this study, the authors utilized an all-human hepatocyte triculture system to capture CYP2C induction using the perpetrators rifampicin, efavirenz, carbamazepine, and apalutamide. In vitro induction parameters were quantified by measuring changes in both mRNA and enzyme activities for CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19. These induction parameters, along with CYP-specific intrinsic clearance (CLint) for the victim compounds, were incorporated into a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of known CYP2C substrates were predicted with and without co-administration of perpetrator compounds using clinical dosing regimens. The results were quantitatively compared with the currently utilized mechanistic static modeling (MSM) approach and the reported clinical DDI outcomes. Results: By incorporating the measured fm of CYP2C substrates into PBPK modeling, we observed a lower propensity to over- or underpredict the exposure of these substrates as victims of CYP2C induction-based DDIs when co-administered with known perpetrators, which resulted in an excellent correlation to observed clinical outcomes. The MSM approach predicted the CYP3A4 induction-based DDI risk accurately but could not capture CYP2C induction with similar precision. Conclusions: Overall, this is the first study that demonstrates the utility of PBPK modeling as a complementary approach to MSM for CYP2C induction-based DDI risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slavsky et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: