Active disturbance rejection improves tracking accuracy and robustness in high-flow aeroengine intake, suggesting advantages over linear control methods.
High-flow aeroengine transient tests involve strong coupling and external disturbances, which pose significant challenges for intake environment simulation systems (IESSs). This study proposes a compound control scheme that combines fixed-time active disturbance rejection with static decoupling methods. The scheme integrates a fixed-time sliding-mode controller (FT-SMC) and a super-twisting fixed-time extended-state observer (ST-FT-ESO). A decoupling transformation separates pressure and temperature dynamics into two independent loops. The observer estimates system states and total disturbances, including residual coupling, while the controller ensures fixed-time convergence. The method is deployed on a real-time programmable logic controller (PLC) and validated through hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) simulations under representative high-flow scenarios. Compared to conventional linear active disturbance rejection decoupling control (LADRDC), the proposed scheme reduces the absolute integral error (AIE) in pressure and temperature tracking by 71.9% and 77.9%, respectively, and reduces the mean-squared error (MSE) by 46.0% and 41.3%. The settling time improves from over 5 s to under 2 s. These results demonstrate improved tracking accuracy, faster convergence, and enhanced robustness against disturbances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: