This study demonstrates automated detection of eye temperature in sheep, highlighting correlation with rectal temperature.
Although rectal temperature is reliable, its measurement requires manual handling and causes stress to animals. IRT provides a non-contact alternative but often ignores bilateral eye temperature differences. This study presents an E-S-YOLO11n model for the automated detection of the binocular regions of sheep, which achieves remarkable performance with a precision of 98.2%, recall of 98.5%, mAP@0.5 of 99.40%, F1 score of 98.35%, FPS of 322.58 frame/s, parameters of 7.27 M, model size of 3.97 MB, and GFLOPs of 1.38. Right and left eye temperatures exhibit a strong correlation (r = 0.8076, p < 0.0001), However, the eye temperatures show only very weak correlation with rectal temperature (right eye: r = 0.0852; left eye: r = −0.0359), and neither figure reaches statistical significance. Rectal temperature is 7.37% and 7.69% higher than the right and left eye temperatures, respectively. Additionally, the right eye temperature is slightly higher than the left eye (p < 0.01). The study demonstrates the feasibility of combining IRT and deep learning for non-invasive eye temperature monitoring, although environmental factors may limit it as a proxy for rectal temperature. These results support the development of efficient thermal monitoring tools for precision animal husbandry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: