Quantitative evaluation finds a KMb campaign improved engagement with caregiver-friendly workplace practices in Canada, highlighting its effectiveness.
BACKGROUND Coupled with an aging population and lower fertility rates, there is a growing number of Carer-employees (CEs) – those balancing unpaid care with paid employment. Over 5.2 million Canadians are CEs juggling this dual role, often incurring negative impacts to their mental and physical health as a result. Given that unpaid care makes up 75% of care provided in Canada, the economic importance of supporting CEs extends to sustaining healthcare systems. Supporting and accommodating CEs in the workplace has not only been proved to be beneficial to the wellbeing of CEs, but also the organization around increased productivity and lower turnover rates. Despite the clear advantages of implementing caregiver-friendly workplace practices (CFWPs) in the workplace, many organizations across Canada remain largely unsupportive of CE accommodations. OBJECTIVE The present study evaluated the impact of a knowledge mobilization (KMb) campaign. The primary objective of the campaign was to raise awareness of CFWPs in Canada and increase the uptake of various tools designed to support the implementation of CFWPs. The KMb campaign entailed two phases; Phase I published four articles in national leading industry magazines geared towards the three target audiences: Human Resources Professionals, Occupational Health and Safety Professionals, and Small-Medium sized businesses. Phase II was designed to complement Phase I through a series of three webinars, each built around the content in the published articles. METHODS The present study uses a quantitative methodology using data collected primarily through the various magazine article publishing companies, as well as project partner McMaster Continuing Education. Engagement metrics and analytics associated with each KMb activity were collected through social media platforms and website analytics. Tracking engagement metrics, such as views, unique views, social media impressions, social media clicks, registrations and attendees, were used to evaluate the impact of the campaign. RESULTS The collected engagement metrics and analytics were analyzed to evaluate the campaign activities’ impact on increasing the engagement with and uptake of specific tools. Phase I activities brought in a total of 36,308 views, 2,469 unique views, 55,445 social media impressions and 432 social media clicks across all four articles. The most successful activity was Article 3, pitched towards the small-medium sized business audience. Phase II was successful in attracting the target audiences to further promote and disseminate the tools. Noticeable increases in engagement with the CFWP tools are observed during the months when Article 3 and 4 were published. CONCLUSIONS Results of the campaign suggest that published magazine articles targeted to the respective audiences are the most effective method of knowledge mobilization for this work, recognizing that paid activities had greater reach and better resources for dissemination. Future research in this area should focus on engaging with employers and professional stakeholders more directly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chmiel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: