Research reveals moderate impact of knowledge translation in caregiver support, highlighting policy needs and engagement strategies.
Objectives Given the rising number of older adults reliant on family and friend caregivers (i.e., those who provide informal care), the Saskatchewan Caregiver Experience Study aimed to examine the experiences of these caregivers in Saskatchewan and identify unmet needs. This paper describes our knowledge translation and mobilization efforts of our study's findings. Methods Researchers partnered with the Saskatoon Council on Aging (SCOA) to conduct the study, recruiting 355 family and friend caregivers. We evaluated impacts across conceptualization, data collection and knowledge mobilization using the Knowledge Engagement Impact Assessment Toolkit to assess how effectively our study's design has the potential to impact policy and practice, which involved completing an Assessment Matrix (quantitative assessment) and Assessment Portrait (qualitative assessment). A stakeholder webinar served as the primary knowledge translation event. Findings An Assessment Matrix revealed moderate impact scores for conceptualization and knowledge mobilization phases. However, the Assessment Portrait reflected collaboration, thorough policy alignment and outreach. Data collection and analysis scored lower. We reflected on this lower score in the Assessment Portrait as being due to fewer avenues for reciprocal engagement and capacity‐building during this stage. Policy recommendations, formed in collaboration with SCOA, were presented at the webinar and called for expanded respite care and streamlined system navigation. Conclusion By systematically evaluating research activities, this study highlights the critical role of knowledge translation in shaping caregiver support. Findings reinforce the importance of early and ongoing stakeholder collaboration, user‐friendly dissemination methods and targeted policy action. Employing a structured framework for measuring engagement impact can guide targeted interventions, ensuring that caregiver programming, legislative reforms and improved care quality align with evolving population needs and priorities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hall et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: