Case note analyzes rescission of mistaken trust dispositions, highlighting implications for legal practitioners.
When voluntarily disposing of property, a donor may make a mistake of so serious a character that equity permits the rescission of that disposition. This equitable jurisdiction to rescind a mistaken disposition was recently considered by the High Court in Sullivan v Sullivan [2025] EWHC 1072 (Ch), a case concerning the mistaken settlement of property under trust. This case note analyses the judgment in Sullivan by reference to Pitt v Holt [2013] UKSC 26, the leading English law authority governing the rescission of mistaken dispositions. It concludes by considering the implications of Sullivan for practitioners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chris Hay (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: