Qualitative analysis reveals mental health help-seeking patterns in East Asian American caregivers, suggesting culturally tailored strategies for support.
Aim(s) To explore mental health help‐seeking behaviours among East Asian American dementia caregivers and construct a theory grounded in their behaviour patterns. Design Qualitative using constructivist grounded theory design. Methods We recruited 20 East Asian American dementia caregivers between August 2023 and March 2024 using purposive sampling. We conducted one‐on‐one interviews and analysed the data using constructivist grounded theory coding. Results We constructed a theory including six concepts and 22 categories. While ‘providing care’, caregivers manage caregiving tasks and personal life, experiencing caregiving challenges. ‘Individual capacity’ is a key to perceiving caregiving situations and ‘considering seeking support’. Various factors can affect ‘using support’. Different types of support can be used separately or in combination. When receiving adequate support, caregivers can ‘gain benefits from support’. These benefits, alongside individual capacities, can shape caregivers' ‘outlook on the present and the future’. Conclusion This study explains the mental health help‐seeking process within East Asian culture, broadening perspectives on diverse populations and highlighting insights into culturally tailored services. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care This study offers clinicians and communities insights into the mental health help‐seeking process among East Asian American dementia caregivers and highlights strategies to encourage their use of mental health services. Impact This theory incorporates aspects of East Asian culture, addressing a research gap in studies of Asian Americans. It may enhance understanding of culturally tailored approaches and facilitate future funding for research and services, considering cultural diversity. Reporting Method The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Patient or Public Contribution No Patient or Public Contribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: