Randomized trial improved speed and agility in 62 adolescent football players, suggesting proprioception is vital for performance.
Introduction: Speed is a key performance factor in football. While traditional training emphasizes strength and power, proprioception—the body’s awareness of position and movement—supports balance and neuromuscular control, which are essential for efficient movement. Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of a 6-month proprioception training program on linear and change-of-direction speed in 17-year-old male football players. Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 62 adolescent male footballers. The experimental group received proprioceptive training focusing on ankle, knee, and hip joint stability, integrated into their regular sessions. The control group continued standard football training. Speed and agility were tested before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using paired and independent t-tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The experimental group showed significant improvements in both linear and change-of-direction speed after six months. The control group did not demonstrate notable changes. Post-test comparisons revealed statistically significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05), favoring the experimental group. Discussion: Performance gains in the experimental group likely resulted from improved neuromuscular coordination, joint stability, and movement efficiency due to proprioceptive training. These adaptations may contribute to faster, more controlled sprinting and directional changes. Conclusion: A 6-month proprioception training program effectively enhances speed performance in adolescent football players. Incorporating such training into youth development programs is recommended to support optimal athletic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bendo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: