Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals a connection between voice and human nature, suggesting human exceptionalism in Agamben's philosophy.
The article proposes a reading of Giorgio Agamben’s La voce umana (The human voice, 2023) in the context of the development of his philosophy of language, and focuses in particular on the consequences of his theory of the “voice” for his definition of human nature. Agamben establishes an inextricable link between human voice and human nature, but his theory of the voice as what must be (inclusively) excluded in order for signifying speech (logos) to emerge also condemns the definition of human nature to an infinite deferral. Since a “true” human voice will emerge only when the division between phonè and logos is overcome, so only this overcoming will allow for a “authentic” definition of human nature. Particular attention is paid to the fact that this theory frames the human voice, and hence human beings, as an exception to an allegedly uniform animality, and thus upholds – perhaps unwillingly – a form of human exceptionalism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salzani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: