This analysis reveals a new interpretation of Avicenna's concepts of meaning and causation, suggesting connections in his epistemology.
Avicenna’s view on “abstraction,” particularly on the initial acquisition of the intelligible forms corresponding to natural kinds, has been hotly debated in the recent scholarship. In this paper, after introducing the problem and quickly reviewing the literature, I will propose a new interpretation, called “Avicennan Abstraction,” according to which Avicenna’s epistemology of abstraction is explainable in light of his semantics of different types of “meaning” and metaphysics of causation, i.e., essential and accidental causes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seyed N. Mousavian (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: