Observational analysis measured evapotranspiration and crop coefficients in subsurface drip-irrigated maize, indicating improved water management strategies.
Highlights Crop evapotranspiration (ETc), single and basal crop coefficients (Kc and Kcb), transpiration (T), and evaporation (E) were quantified for subsurface drip-irrigated maize. Bowen Ratio Energy Balance System (BREBS)-measured seasonal ETc was 667 mm in 2005 and 571 mm in 2006. BREBS energy balance closure errors were very low (2.6 W/m2 in 2005 and 3.6 W/m2 in 2006) with 97%-98% closure. Magnitude and timing of occurrence of maximum Kc and Kcb exhibited interannual variation. FAO56 method overestimated BREBS-measured ETc by 9.3% (root mean squared error, RMSD = 1.0 mm/d) in 2005; estimates were within 1% of the BREBS-measured ETc in 2006, but with a greater RMSD (1.3 mm/d). T was 65%-70% of ETc and E was ~30% of ETc in 2005; T was 60%-65% of ETc and E was 35% of ETc in 2006. ABSTRACT. Measured crop coefficients, especially for subsurface drip-irrigated (SDI) cropping systems, are rare, but they play a critical role in estimating crop evapotranspiration (ET c ) (or latent heat flux, LE) for effective irrigation management, water resources planning, and many other purposes. Surface energy balance variables [ET c , sensible heat flux (H), soil heat flux (G), incoming shortwave radiation (R s ), net radiation (R n ), surface albedo (a)], plant variables [leaf area index (LAI), plant height], and climate variables were measured for SDI-irrigated maize using an advanced Bowen Ratio Energy Balance System (BREBS). Crop growth stage-specific single and basal K c curves (K c and K cb , respectively) were developed as a function of cumulative growing degree days (SGDD). The FAO56 method was employed to partition ET c into transpiration (T) and evaporation (E). The seasonal average BREBS energy balance closure (LE+H = R n - G) error was only 2.63 W/m 2 with a low maximum difference of 19.3 W/m 2 in 2005, and the average error was 3.62 W/m 2 with a seasonal maximum difference of 18.4 W/m 2 in 2006. ET c for a given growth stage varied within the season and for the same growth stage between the seasons. BREBS-measured seasonal ET c was 667 mm in 2005 and 571 mm in 2006. The field-average crop water productivity was 2.5 kg/m 3 in 2005 and 2.8 kg/m 3 in 2006. The maximum growth-stage-specific ET c was measured during the R1-Silking to R2-Blister stages in 2005 (107 mm), while it was 79.8 mm between the same growth stages in 2006. In 2005, during the vegetative stage (V1 to Tasseling), ET c was 202 mm, which accounted for 30% of the seasonal ET c , and ET c for the reproductive stage [Tasseling to Physiological Maturity (PM)], was 419 mm (accounting for 63% of the total ET c , 667 mm). In 2006, both vegetative and reproductive stages had similar ET c . ET c during the vegetative stage (V1 to Tasseling) was 267 mm (accounted for 47% of the seasonal ET c , 571 mm), and ET c for the reproductive stage (Tasseling to PM) was 266 mm (also accounted for 47% of the seasonal ET c ). On a two-season average, R1-Silking to R2-Blister stage had the highest ET c (93.4 mm), followed by V10 to V12 stage (73.1 mm), Tasseling to R1-Silking (56.3 mm), and R2-Blister to R3-Milk, R4-Dough to R5-Dent, and V12 to V18-Tasseling stages all having similar ET c (53-55 mm). From planting to V1, ET c (46 mm in 2005 and 38.2 mm in 2006) accounted for 7% and 6% of the seasonal ET c , respectively. K c values exhibited strong dependence on SGDD in both seasons. The growth stage-specific K c values differed between the growing seasons more than the interannual variation for the same stage. The maximum K c was 1.20 during the R1-Silking to R2-Blister stage as in 2005, whereas the maximum was observed during the V12 to V18-Tasseling and R1-Silking stages as 1.25 and 1.24, respectively, in 2006. The relationship between LAI and K c was strong and linear in both seasons. In 2005, the FAO56 method overestimated BREBS-measured ET c by 9.3% with a root mean squared difference (RMSD) of 1.0 mm/d, while its estimates in 2006 were within 1% of the BREBS-measured ET c , but with a higher RMSD (1.28 mm/d). The FAO56 method overestimated BREBS-measured seasonal ET c by 102 mm (15%) and 61 mm (10.3%) in 2005 and 2006, respectively. In 2005, maize T ranged from near zero during emergence and during the late season (during PM and leaf senescence) to 9 mm/d at R1-Silking and R2-Blister stage; and ranged from near zero to 9.7 mm/d during R1-Silking stage in 2006. In both seasons, T exhibited its maximum values from about V10 stage R4-Dough stage. Seasonal E was 116 mm in 2005 and 124 mm in 2006. On a seasonal average basis, T was 65%-70% of ET c and E was ~30% of ET c in 2005; T was 60%-65% of ET c and E was 35% of ET c in 2006. Data and information presented in this research can be invaluable for better management of irrigated maize production while maximizing the effectiveness of planning, allocating, and using water resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suat Irmak (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: