This review shows shifts to generative AI use in a large chemistry course, indicating a model for STEM instruction.
As generative AI tools become widely accessible, instructors may face uncertainty about how to respond. This review describes how a large-enrollment general chemistry course was adapted to promote AI use through intentional instructional design. The course featured early framing of AI use, in-class modeling of prompting strategies, AI-compatible practice resources, and regular reflection. These elements were designed to promote intentional, ethical, and metacognitive engagement with AI. Student interviews conducted at the end of the semester offer illustrative insights into how learners responded to the course structure, highlighting shifts from transactional to generative AI use. This grounded example offers a model for promoting AI use in STEM classrooms and provides practical strategies and instructional resources for instructors seeking to integrate AI in pedagogically meaningful ways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: