Mixed-method investigation demonstrates that self-sacrificial leadership positively influences employee retention in organizations facing crises, suggesting a key role for organizational identity.
This mixed-method investigation forays into the influence mechanism of self-sacrificial leadership on employees’ retention intention in exhibition enterprises under crises. In study 1 (the qualitative inquiry), in-depth interviews with 20 employees were conducted, and a process mechanism model was constructed on how self-sacrificial leadership affects employee retention intention, following a story line of “action strategy→phenomenon→result.” In study 2 (the quantitative research), we use social exchange theory and social identity theory to build a structural equation model, which verifies the positive impact of self-sacrificial leadership on employee retention intention through 404 valid questionnaires, and tests the mediating role of organizational identification. In addition, political capital is found to strengthen the relationship between self-sacrificial leadership and employee organizational identification, while employee job insecurity plays an inverted U-shaped moderating role that first strengthens but subsequently weakens during the process of self-sacrificial leadership. In conclusion, this study reveals the functional mechanism of self-sacrificial leadership in exhibition enterprises under crises, verifies the boundary conditions of self-sacrificial leadership, and provides practical implications for sustainability and human capital development for exhibition enterprises under crises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: