Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 17, 2025Journal of Law Politic and HumanitiesOpen Access

Joint Interpretative Statements Of Investment Agreements: An Overview Of The Practice

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

NVNicholas VellyHAHuala AdolfPAPrita Amalia

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis reveals joint interpretative statements impact investor state arbitration practices, suggesting improvements for clarity and intent.

Key Points

  • Joint interpretative statements clarify ambiguities in treaties, aligning tribunal decisions with state intent.
  • Inconsistent acceptance by tribunals complicates their effectiveness, raising questions about genuine interpretations.
  • Analysis of various arbitration cases, including NAFTA and EU, highlights significant regional shifts affecting practices.
  • The study advocates for clear treaty provisions to enhance predictability while balancing state sovereignty and investor protections.

Cite This Study

Velly et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af5bb6ad7bf08b1eadf64bhttps://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.1960
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1INTER-STATE INVESTMENT DISPUTES: CONSULTATIONS, ARBITRATION, AND THE LIMITS OF DIPLOMATIC PROTECTION2013 · 5 citations
  2. 2Interpretation and Scope of Consent-to-Arbitration Clauses in Investment Disputes: A Comparative Legal Analysis2014 · 6 citations
  3. 3Applicable law in international investment disputes2025
  4. 4Investment Arbitration Between Public and Private Foundations: Qualification of Bilateral Investment Treaties and the Prevention of Fragmentation of International Law2016 · 12 citations
  5. 5Canadian Judges and Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Critical Analysis of Set-Aside Proceedings2026