Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2025International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science

Electoral Technology in the Democratization Process: A Comparative Analysis of Kenya and Estonia

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SSShem Ongati Siteki

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Comparative analysis shows that electoral technology significantly affects democratic outcomes in Kenya and Estonia, suggesting vital implications for reform.

Key Points

  • Electoral technology influences democratic outcomes, highlighting contrasting successful and challenging experiences in Kenya and Estonia.
  • Estonia’s internet voting showcases strong public trust due to effective institutional safeguards, earning it a global reputation for e-democracy.
  • Kenya’s biometric systems faced controversy, as implementation issues raised public skepticism about reliability and transparency during elections.
  • The analysis stresses the importance of context and institutional integrity, advocating for tailored reforms to enhance transparency and civic participation.

Cite This Study

Shem Ongati Siteki (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af5bbcad7bf08b1eadf91bhttps://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.907000481
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cyber security in enhancing democracy in Kenya2025
  2. 2Digital Vote: Assessing Constitutional Compliance of Electoral Technology Laws and Verifiability of votes in Kenya2025
  3. 3Trust and electoral technologies throughout the election cycle: Comparing the USA, Netherlands, Poland, and Kenya2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4Effects of Digital Technologies on Africa’s Electoral Democracy2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5The Role of Technology in Transforming the Democratic Electoral Process2026