Finite element analysis reveals how attachment positioning affects tooth movement and stress in clear aligners.
Background: Molar distalization in adult patients using clear aligners remains a biomechanical challenge, particularly regarding the efficiency of force transmission and the control of secondary movements. Attachment positioning may significantly influence tooth movement. Methods: Three 3D finite element models of an upper first molar with a 1 mm PET-G aligner were developed, differing only in the mesial, central or distal placement of a vertical beveled rectangular attachment. Dental displacement, contact forces and Periodontal Ligament (PDL) stress were evaluated using Autodesk Fusion FEA. Results: Central attachment placement produced the greatest distal displacement (0.314 mm), while mesial placement generated the lowest PDL stress (0.150 MPa) despite slightly higher contact force (1.2 N). All models exhibited ~2° coronal tipping. Conclusions: Attachment position influences movement magnitude and biomechanical efficiency. Mesial placement may optimize stress distribution, while Autodesk Fusion provides an accessible platform for digital orthodontic biomechanical analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
G. Salas (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: