This evaluation assesses the FFRLS framework's accuracy in identifying parameters for lithium-sulfur batteries, highlighting significant errors.
While Forgetting Factor Recursive Least Square (FFRLS) algorithms with evaluation mechanisms have been developed to address SOC-dependent parameter mapping shifts and their efficacy has been proven in Li-ion batteries, their applicability to lithium–sulfur (Li-S) batteries remains uncertain due to different electrochemical characteristics. This study critically evaluates the applicability of a Fisher information matrix-constrained FFRLS framework for online parameter identification in Li-S battery equivalent circuit network (ECN) models. Experimental validation using distinct drive cycles showed that the identification results of polarization-related parameters are significantly biased between different current excitations, and root mean square error (RMSE) variations diverge by 100%, with terminal voltage estimation errors more than 0.05 V. The parametric uncertainty under variable excitation profiles and voltage plateau estimation deficiencies confirms the inadequacy of such approaches, constraining model-based online identification viability for Li-S automotive applications. Future research should therefore prioritize hybrid estimation architectures integrating electrochemical knowledge with data-driven observers, alongside excitation capturing specifically optimized for Li-S online parameter observability requirements and cell nonuniformity and aging condition consideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: