Bimetallic Rh-Ni catalysts improved cyclohexylamine yield in cyclohexanone amination, indicating enhanced catalytic efficiency.
Reductive amination of cyclohexanone with NH3 and H2 over Rh and Rh-Ni catalysts on SiO2 has been studied. Research has focused on the catalytic efficiency of monometallic and bimetallic catalysts in the production of cyclohexylamine, a key intermediate in the synthesis of numerous fine chemicals. Through the wet impregnation method, Rh and Rh-Ni catalysts with varying nickel loadings (1, 2, 5, and 10 wt.%) were synthesized and characterized using techniques such as N2 physisorption, TEM, HAADF-STEM, XRD, XPS, H2-TPR, and NH3-TPD. The catalytic reactions were conducted under controlled conditions using a glass-coated reactor, using ammonia as nitrogen source. Rh-Ni bimetallic catalysts exhibited the highest conversion rates on reductive amination, attributed to enhanced dispersion and advantageous surface properties. High metal dispersion and small particle sizes were confirmed by TEM, HAADF-STEM, and XRD. XPS analysis confirmed the reduced state of Rh and mainly oxidized state of Ni, while H2-TPR and NH3-TPD results indicated improved reducibility and acidity, respectively, which are critical for catalytic activity. Monometallic Rh/SiO2 catalyst showed 83.4% of conversion after 300 min and selectivity of 99.1% toward the desired product cyclohexylamine. The addition of nickel, a cheap and easily available metal, increases the activity without compromising selectivity. At 300 min of the reaction, the 2 wt.% NiRh/SiO2 catalyst exhibited the highest conversion, yield, and selectivity for the desired product cyclohexylamine, 99.8%, 96.4%, and 96.6% respectively. Additionally, this catalyst is recyclable after the fourth cycle, showing 99.5% selectivity and 74.0% yield for cyclohexylamine at 75.7% conversion. Recycling tests confirmed the stability of bimetallic catalysts, maintaining performance over multiple cycles without significant deactivation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morales et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: