Experiments reveal how memorability and speed impact time perception and memory recall in visual stimuli.
Visual stimuli are known to vary in their perceived duration, with some stimuli engendering so-called “time dilation” and others “time compression” effects. Previous theories have suggested these effects rely on the level of attention devoted to stimuli, magnitude of the stimulus dimension, or intensity of the population neural response, yet cannot account for the full range of experimental effects. Recently, we demonstrated that perceived time is affected by the image properties of scene clutter, size, and memorability (Ma, et al. 2024), with the former compressing and latter two dilating duration. Further, perceived duration also predicted recall of images 24h later, on top of memorability. To explain the memorability effect, we found that a recurrent convolutional neural network (rCNN) could recapitulate the time dilation effect by indexing the rate of entropy collapse, or “speed”, across successive timesteps, with more memorable stimuli associated with faster speeds. Here, we replicate and extend these Wndings via three experiments (n=20ea.) where subjects performed a sub-second temporal bisection task using memorability stimuli with increasing memorability, but a constant speed (exp 1), increasing speed, but constant memorability (exp 2), or increasing in both (exp 3), each followed by a surprise memory test 24hr later. We found that either increasing memorability or speed alone led to time dilation effects, with faster/slower speeds shifting memory recall by ~8.4% in either direction. However, when both metrics increased, memorability dilated time while speed compressed it, while still improving recall overall. These Wndings can be explained by a model wherein the visual system is tuned to a preferred speed for processing stimuli that scales with the magnitude of visual response, such that stimuli closer to this speed are dilated in time. Overall, these Wndings provide a new lens for interpreting time dilation/compression effects and how visual stimuli are prioritized at temporal scales.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wiener et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: