Numerical model demonstrates effects of aggregate content and fissure parameters on concrete blasting damage.
In urban construction, the efficient demolition of concrete structures imposes high-precision requirements on blasting technology. The mesoscopic evolution mechanism of concrete blasting damage is the key to optimizing blasting parameters. In this study, a numerical model of concrete blasting is established using Particle Flow Code (PFC). By comparing it with an experimental model containing a blast hole and a horizontal single fissure, the rationality and reliability of the model in simulating blasting damage evolution are verified. On this basis, four groups of control variable schemes are designed (concrete particle size distribution, aggregate content, prefabricated fissure inclination angle, and fissure length) to systematically explore the effects of mesoscopic structures and macroscopic defects on blasting damage. The results show that larger concrete particles make it easier for damage cracks to avoid large particles, forming sparse and irregular crack networks. A higher aggregate content enhances the “obstruction-guidance” effect of aggregate distribution on damage. When the aggregate content is 40%, the vertical damage expansion is the most prominent, reaching up to 3.05 cm. Fissure inclination angle affects the damage direction by guiding the propagation path of stress waves. Fissures inclined at 30°~60° serve as preferential damage channels, while 90° vertical fissures make vertical damage more significant. An increased fissure length expands the damage range, and the damage degree is the highest for a 40 mm long fissure, being 1.29 times that of a 30 mm fissure. The research results reveal the mesoscopic evolution laws of concrete blasting damage, providing a theoretical basis for the optimization of engineering blasting parameters and safety control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: