Evaluation of Each Three Entamoeba histolytica- and Strongyloides stercoralis-Specific Real-Time PCR Assays Applying Test Comparisons Without Reference Standards

Molecular diagnoses of Entamoeba histolytica and Strongyloides stercoralis in human samples are becoming increasingly common. To contribute to the ongoing standardization of molecular diagnostic approaches targeting these parasites, we compared three published E. histolytica- and S. stercoralis-specific real-time PCR assays in test comparisons without a reference standard. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to calculate diagnostic accuracy estimations for the three compared assays per parameter. The comparison was conducted using stool samples from Ghanaian individuals. In the course of the assessment of 873 stool samples, the number of detected positive PCR results ranged from 10 to 15 for S. stercoralis and from 4 to 54 for E. histolytica depending on the applied assay. Diagnostic accuracy estimates of real-time PCR sensitivity for S. stercoralis and E. histolytica ranged from 89% to 100% and from 75% to 100%, respectively; diagnostic estimates of specificity ranged from 99% to 100% and from 94% to 100%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy-adjusted prevalence estimates were 1.2% for S. stercoralis and 0.5% for E. histolytica. High cycle threshold values of real-time PCR > 35 showed a particularly reduced likeliness of reproducibility when applying competitor real-time PCR assays. There were no clear-cut differences in terms of diagnostic accuracy favoring either small-subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid (SSU rRNA) gene sequences or the S. stercoralis dispersed repetitive sequence for S. stercoralis PCR. The same applied to the comparison of real-time PCRs targeting SSU rRNA gene sequences and the SSU rRNA episomal repeat sequence (SREPH) of E. histolytica. In conclusion, interchangeability of the compared real-time PCR assays was higher for the assessed S. stercoralis assays compared with the assessed E. histolytica assays. Regional diagnostic accuracy testing seems advisable before literature-adapted assays for rare tropical pathogens like S. stercoralis and E. histolytica are applied in different study regions.