This research demonstrates enhanced gas separation in metal-organic frameworks using spiro ligands, suggesting new avenues for efficient CO2 capture.
An emerging direction in the design of crystalline porous materials is the application of bioisosteric replacement strategy that replaces benzene ring with an aliphatic core; however, maintaining isoreticular chemistry upon such replacement is elusive. While bicyclic cores have been employed for this purpose, few studies are known that use spiro ligands for designing metal–organic frameworks for gas separation applications. As a benzene bioisostere, spiro ligands are more challenging than other bioisosteres because they are more flexible and deviate significantly from that of para-benzene-based ligands. In this work, we show that the use of a pore-space-partition strategy generates a multimodule system in which it is possible to exert a high level of control over the positioning, orientation, and alignment of carboxylate groups in a spiro ligand. Here, we report a family of isoreticular MOFs on a partitioned acs (pacs) structure with spiro[3.3]heptane-2,6-dicarboxylic acid as the framework-forming module, together with three different pore-partition modules based on tripyridyl ligands. The isoreticular chemistry can be extended to both homometallic (Fe) and heterometallic (CoV and CoFe) compositions. These materials exhibit excellent sorption properties such as high uptake capacity for CO2 (61.9 cm3/g) and small hydrocarbon gases (e.g., 116.3 cm3/g for C2H2 and 101.4 cm3/g for C2H4), inverse C2H6/C2H4 selectivity, and promising separation performance for C2H2/CO2 (selectivity up to 5.5), C3H8/CH4 (selectivity up to 279), and C2H6/CH4 (selectivity up to 22.7) gas mixtures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ajayan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: