Meta-analysis reveals safety and efficacy of combining radiofrequency ablation and endoscopic resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell neoplasia, suggesting a potential alternative treatment.
Background: Esophageal squamous cell neoplasia (ESCN) is the sixth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with patients experiencing a decrease in life expectancy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endoscopic resection (ER) have each been recommended for treatment of early superficial ESCN in the available clinical guidelines; however, the combined application of RFA and ER for treatment of early superficial ESCN remains inconclusive. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of RFA combined with ER in patients diagnosed with early superficial ESCN. Methods: Three major bibliographic databases were reviewed for enrollment of case series and cohort studies before September 17, 2023. We included adults with early superficial ESCN who were receiving a combination of RFA and ER, focusing on their end-of-treatment histological complete response (CR), as well as both acute and late postoperative adverse events (AEs) at the follow-up period. Results: Five studies involving a total of 382 participants for analysis were used. The end-of-treatment histological CR, acute and late postoperative AEs were 91% (95% CI, 0.87-0.93), 6% (95% CI, 0.02-0.17), and 21% (95% CI, 0.05-0.57), respectively. With respect to safety, stricture was most commonly encountered. In subgroup analysis, sequential ER followed by RFA achieved similar end-of-treatment histological CR as well as higher acute and later complications postoperatively. Conclusions: For patients diagnosed with early superficial ESCN, endoscopic RFA combined with ER achieved both a feasible end-of-treatment histological CR and tolerable complications postoperatively. The combination of endoscopic RFA and ER may therefore be considered as an alternative choice, although its role in clinical practice remains inconclusive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: