This essay discusses incommensurability's role in addressing cultural differences, suggesting it may enhance intercultural communication.
This essay engages the idea of "incommensurability" as a reflexive attunement to recognizing cultural differences as simultaneously non-equivalent and non-hierarchical. Specifically, we approach incommensurability as a response to commensurability, which we understand as a difference-as-problem assumption undergirding colonial modes of thinking within/beyond intercultural communication inquiry. By reviewing several frameworks that inform a politics of difference-in-commune, we identify two dimensions of incommensurability to articulate the space of in-betweenness that merits further intercultural communication theorizing: (a) the critical oppositional personal-identitarian thesis, and (b) the critical oppositional relational-communal thesis. In short, incommensurable difference should be understood as a site of nourishment rather than a deficit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: