Analysis reveals that mixed proportional representation could enhance political inclusion in Bangladesh, indicating a shift from the first-past-the-post model.
This study examines the necessity for electoral reform in Bangladesh and proposes a Mixed Proportional Representation (MPR) system as a feasible alternative to the current First-Past-the-Post (FPTP) model. The existing system, despite its simplistic design, has led to unequal representation, political monopolization, and the insufficient representation of marginalized groups. The suggested MPR model can integrate constituency-based representation with proportional party lists to guarantee local accountability and enhanced political inclusion. The study elucidates the potential of MPR to foster pluralism, mitigate election distortion, and augment democratic involvement by drawing insights from comparative political systems. The research analyses the structural, political, and logistical obstacles that can impede the prompt implementation of this system in Bangladesh, including institutional unpreparedness, legislative limitations, and opposition from prevailing factions. A methodical implementation strategy, encompassing legal reforms, civic education, and international cooperation can help gradual transition to MPR, fostering a more egalitarian and robust democratic process in Bangladesh.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahaman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: