Randomized controlled trial shows similar glycemic control with dapagliflozin and pharmacist intervention, highlighting adherence improvements in type 2 diabetes.
Background: Type 2 diabetes is a major global health issue. Poor glycemic control, often due to non-adherence, increases complications. Pharmacologic intensification and pharmacist-led interventions help optimize diabetes management. Objectives: To assess clinical pharmacist interventions and dapagliflozin effects on glycemic control, safety, and adherence in type 2 diabetes. Methods: A 3-month, three-arm open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in Sulaimani city, Iraq, on adults with T2DM (HbA1c 7–10%, n=138) were randomized to dapagliflozin add-on (G1, n=46), clinical pharmacist intervention (G2, n=46; including medication optimization, adherence support, and counselling), or standard therapy (G3, n=46). Primary outcomes were HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) changes, and safety; secondary included lipids, blood pressure, and adherence (Modified Hill-Bone scale). Results: Among 125 completers, the median (IQR) difference in the HbA1c % was -0.7(-1.6 to 0.0) for G1, -0.665 (-1.55 to -0.245) for G2, and +0.05 (-0.3 to 0.597) for G3, which was significantly different between G1 and G3 and G2 and G3. The difference in the FPG was -37 (-83 to 1.0) for G1, -14.5 (-38.75 to 6) for G2, and -1.5 (-11.75 to 30.75) for G3. The difference is significant between G1 and G3, and G2 and G3. Medication adherence improved significantly only in G2 (high adherence: 80% to 95%, p=0.043). Adverse events were low in all groups (hypoglycemia: 4.5–7.3%), while UTIs were 7.3% in G1 only. Conclusions: Clinical pharmacist-led interventions were equally as effective as dapagliflozin for glycemic control but superior in enhancing medication adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: