Cross-sectional analysis explores CSF pressure, imaging, and visual outcomes in IIH patients, suggesting comprehensive assessments are crucial.
Background: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a disorder of elevated intracranial pressure without secondary causes, primarily affecting young, obese women. Although headache and visual impairment are hallmark features, the link between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure, neuro-ophthalmic findings, and visual prognosis remains unclear. This study evaluated neuro-ophthalmic presentations of IIH and analyzed associations between CSF pressure, imaging findings, and visual function testing in patients with IIH. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 100 patients with IIH at the National Institute of Neuro Sciences & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh, from July 2022 to June 2025. Demographic and clinical data, CSF opening pressure, imaging results, and ophthalmological evaluations (fundal photography and perimetry) were collected. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and logistic regression, were conducted using SPSS version 25.0, with a significance threshold of p <0.05. Results: The mean age was 26.16 ± 7.49 years, with female predominance. Headache (97%), papilledema (93%), and visual impairment (88%) were the most common symptoms. CSF pressure > 25 cm was noted in 64% of patients and showed a statistically significant association with visual loss (p=0.02), but not with double vision (p=0.96), tinnitus (p=0.51), papilledema (p=0.56), or cranial nerve palsy (p=0.41). Imaging abnormalities were rare (4%). Logistic regression revealed no significant predictive value for CSF pressure >25 (OR 0.13, p=0.06) or perimetry (OR 1.66, p=0.49) for visual impairment. Conclusion: IIH frequently presents with visual impairment and papilledema; however, CSF pressure alone cannot predict IIH. Multimodal evaluation with ophthalmic assessment and imaging is essential for risk stratification and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarkar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: