Analysis reveals improved accuracy estimation for diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias, highlighting methods for better test selection.
Youden index is one of the broadly used measurements to assess the accuracy of the diagnostic test under consideration. In real medical diagnostic studies, verification of the true disease status might only be partially available due to ethical and cost considerations, and the drawbacks of gold-standard tests. Therefore, statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of a test based only on data from subjects with verified disease status is typically biased. Youden indices for the assessment of accuracy and optimal cutoff point(s) selection in diagnostic tests classifying two disease stages and three disease stages have been proposed without considering this verification bias. In this article, we develop novel confidence intervals for three-class Youden index to correct verification bias under the assumption that the true disease status, if missing, is missing at random (MAR). The proposed methods provide a comprehensive guide to dealing with the verification bias in diagnostic test accuracy studies and lead to a better choice of diagnostic tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: