Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis shows high satisfaction and safety in treating nasal defects in Asian patients with VYC-25L, indicating its viable use in non-surgical rhinoplasty.
Non-surgical rhinoplasty using injectable fillers is gaining popularity as a minimally invasive alternative for nasal reshaping, particularly in patients seeking correction of post-surgical deformities or enhancement of nasal projection. The choice of filler is crucial for achieving optimal aesthetic outcomes and ensuring safety, particularly in high-risk vascular areas. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of VYC-25L, a high G’ and high cohesivity hyaluronic acid filler, in treating nasal deficiencies in Asian patients. This retrospective analysis included 25 Asian patients treated with VYC-25L for nasal augmentation. Injections were performed using a standardized grid-based protocol with a supra-periosteal technique, emphasizing midline placement and slow, small-volume injections to mitigate vascular risks. Aesthetic outcomes were assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) by independent surgeons, while patient satisfaction was recorded via a three-degree questionnaire. Safety was evaluated through the monitoring of adverse events over 12 months. All patients demonstrated significant improvement in nasal projection and contour, with 100% scoring 8 or higher on the VAS at 2 weeks post-treatment. Patient satisfaction was high, with 92% rating the correction as “adequate.” Results remained stable at 3, 6, and 12 months. Minor complications included transient bruising (12%) and a single case of nasal dorsum hematoma (4%), both resolving without intervention. No instances of vascular occlusion, necrosis, or infection were observed. VYC-25L is a safe and effective option for non-surgical rhinoplasty in Asian patients, providing durable aesthetic results with minimal downtime. The grid-based injection protocol enhances standardization and reproducibility, making it a valuable tool for optimizing outcomes. Further prospective studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magagnotto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: