Quantitative survey reveals migrants in Lafia experience satisfactory housing, suggesting challenges remain in urban planning.
This study examines the housing and living conditions of migrants in Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, a rapidly urbanising centre that is facing pressure on its infrastructure due to increasing migration. In comparison, initial concerns highlighted potential challenges, such as overcrowding and poor sanitation; the research aimed to provide empirical data to inform sustainable urban planning. A quantitative survey design was employed to collect data from 399 respondents, comprising both internal and cross-border migrants, using a structured questionnaire. The sample was determined using Taro Yamane’s formula, and a multi-stage sampling technique ensured representativeness. The demographic analysis revealed a migrant population that is predominantly male (55.1%), economically active (45.1% aged 31-45 years), and relatively educated (37.3% with tertiary education). A significant portion (35.1%) was self-employed, indicating reliance on the informal sector. Contrary to the study’s initial premise, the findings on housing and living conditions were largely positive: a vast majority (92.2%) reported living in decent housing with access to basic amenities, and 93.7% perceived their current living conditions as better than before migration. Furthermore, 92.5% of respondents found housing costs in Lafia to be affordable. Despite these positive perceptions, 96.2% acknowledged that poor housing conditions have a negative impact on economic well-being. These results suggest that while migrants in Lafia generally experience satisfactory housing and improved living standards, the underlying awareness of housing’s economic impact remains strong.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magaji et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: