Method demonstrates improved Sharpe ratio in constrained portfolios for ESG preferences, implying enhanced returns.
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing incorporates ESG factors into the investment decision-making process. By screening for companies with strong ESG practices, investors can potentially achieve long-term value growth and reduce the risk of corporate misconduct. In ESG investing, portfolio managers use a screened universe of stocks to construct portfolios based on financial risk and returns. At this point, the extent to which ESG factors are reflected in the portfolio allocation ratios becomes a black box. This study proposes a method for constructing an ESG portfolio that considers investors’ ESG preferences. Investors’ perceived importance of ESG is quantified using a hierarchical decision-making method. This measure is then applied as a constraint condition to determine stock investment ratios by solving a risk minimization problem. For a universe of 50 stocks, the Sharpe ratio of the constrained portfolio considering investors’ ESG preferences was higher than that of the unconstrained portfolio.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumagai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: